Stop Hiding - Join us!
Dear Brothers and Sisters, We
must work together to re-educate our governments in the economic and human disaster
in the enforcement of Marijuana Laws as an un-constitutional criminal act
against all of God's creatures.
"Cowards die many times before
but the Valiant never taste of death but once.
Of all the wonders that I yet have heard.
It seems to me most strange that men should fear;
Seeing that death, a necessary end, Will come when it will come."
Rev. Brother Michael J. Baldasaro (left)
Brother Walter A. Tucker (right)
the Guelph Court House 1986
for Clearwater Abbey
Fighting for Justice over Clearwater Abbey!
Reverend Brother Michael J.
Baldasaro & Reverend Brother Walter A. Tucker (Right), blanketing Guelph
Provincial Court in 1986. All charges of trespassing on Church Lands at
Clearwater Abbey are dismissed by Judge Bruce Payne at Guelph,
The Federal Crown Prosecutor
previously dropped all cultivation of Marijuana charges, over our objections,
because they did not want our claims to go before a jury.
We were illegally removed from Clearwater Abbey by 30 S.W.A.T.
Ontario Provincial Police who refused to let us put on our
clothes. Her Majesty's minions then chained us, wrapped us in orange
plastic blankets, threw us into the back of a paddy wagon, dragged us away
to a jail cell and then to court where we were forced to appear before a
Justice of the Peace for a bail hearing, clad only in prison
blankets. In the end, Judge Bruce Payne dismissed the bogus charges,
once again over our objections, because the Prosecution refused to give us
the full disclosure they undertook to do under Judge Payne's previous
The Churches claim of right
to the Abbey was heard and dismissed by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the
Spring of 1997, 11 years later. An application for Leave to Appeal is
pending before the Supreme Court of Canada.
We shall never quit fighting for our rights and freedoms!
Confronted by authority your right is to
remain silent. On private property you have the
immediate right to see the Search Warrant. In public confrontations the same
YOU ARE INVIOLABLE
If I took your belt from you without your permission,
how long will I have to keep it before it becomes mine? - Answer
Your Home is Your Castle!
the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed
the common law right in Colet v.
The Queen that "The police are never justified in entering onto
private property unless
they first announce their presence and demonstrate their lawful authority
with a warrant.
It is unconstitutional for police to lie and misrepresent themselves and to
purpose in order to entrap anyone into violating any law.
cases you have the constitutional right to the counsel of your own choice
answering any questions, either in and/or out of Court. Counsel includes your
family, and friends etc. and not just lawyers.
The Truth about Canada's Marijuana Laws!
The Truth about Canada's Marijuana Laws!
legislation against God's Tree of Life, Marijuana was declared a federal
civil non-criminal public health law by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1979
via its ruling in The Queen v. Patrick Arnold Hauser
that Canada's Narcotic Control Act
"is not a matter of criminal
us convicted of Marijuana Offenses do not have a criminal record and should
not allow ourselves to be treated like or referred to as criminals as if we
had actually violated the Criminal Code of Canada. If charged and/or
convicted we must demand that the court and no-one, not the Judge,
Jury, Media and especially not the Prosecution refer to the charges,
conviction and/or punishment as if it were criminal.
In 1995 Reverend Baldasaro
was convicted at Hamilton, Ontario of Trafficking in Marijuana. The Chief
Judge and the Crown Prosecutor kept referring to the charges as criminal,
even to the jury, however when Reverends Tucker and Baldasaro objected the
judge and crown were forced to concede that the proceedings were
non-criminal and to refer to them as such before the jury and even at
sentencing which ended in 1997 with a successful appeal as to sentence in
the Court of Appeal for Ontario.
It is immoral for the state
to make it appear that persons charged with and/or convicted of Marijuana/Drug
Offenses violated criminal law when their authority to act is based
upon a federal non-criminal health legislation. Such misrepresentations and
lies cause us to be stigmatized "Reefer Madness" as if we
actually committed a grave criminal offence when in fact, we had not!
The incorrect reference by
the Justice System is biased and discriminating. The use of the word
criminal in non-criminal matters illegally gives the perception of a
violent offender and offence under the Criminal Code. It wrongly prejudices
the judge, jury, media and public against an otherwise non-violent harmless
defendant "victimless crime". Such misrepresentations of the
circumstances surrounding such non-criminal matters constitutes cruel and
unusual treatment and punishment and is un-constitutionally criminal and
illegal to say the very least and has brought the administration of justice
Our Justice System is
currently painting everyone with the same brush, regardless of their
offence and without any consideration to the degree of these non-criminal
Proceedings under the
Narcotic Control Act and/or the Controlled Drug and Substances Act can only
result in a record for a conviction under those specific Acts. Only a
conviction for a violation of the provisions of the of the Criminal Code
itself could result in a Criminal Record upon conviction.
The mere fact that criminal
procedures and sanctions are being used by the prosecution in the criminal
courts for non-criminal crimes such as drug and provincial offenses, i.e.
Trespass to Property Actor a conviction for the crime of jay-walking
will not result in a criminal record is proof that one may have a Jay
Walking Record and/or like myself and so many other Canadians, a Narcotic
Control Act or Controlled Drug and Substances Act Record NOT CRIMINAL!
See the Hauser decision cited below:
General. In R. v. Hauser(1979),
46 C.C.C. (2d) 481,  1 S.C.R. 984, 8 C.R. (3d) 89
It was held (5:2) that the Attorney
General of Canada has exclusive jurisdiction to control the proceedings in
non-Criminal Code offenses where the particular offence does not depend for
its validity on the criminal law power in s. 91(27) of the Constitution
Act, 1867. In particular the Attorney General of Canada has power to
prosecute offenses under the Narcotic Control Act, (Can.) since that Act is
not a matter of criminal law, but rather falls within Parliament's
general jurisdiction to legislate for the "peace, order and good government"
Hauser, the Supreme Court ruled that Marijuana Laws, originally
prosecuted under the provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada were
un-constitutional or ultra vires parliament and re-shuffled the Legislation
under the Narcotic Control Act (now the Controlled Drugs and substances
Act) a.k.a. the War Measures Act, (peace, order and good government)
pursuant to the provisions of Section 91 of the British North America Acts,
1867 to 1997. known today as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
It wasn't criminal then and
it is not criminal now. It is a
non-criminal federal health law,
un-constitutional under any guise!
Canada's Marijuana Offenders
are currently being prosecuted by the Attorney General of Canada on
behalf of the Minister of Health Canada and not as criminals.
In criminal law there must be
a victim and the complainant must be the victim of the alleged offense.
Marijuana laws have always been referred to as victimless crimes.
Reference: Hauser, supra and in the Criminal Code "complainant
means" the victim of the alleged offense.
We are being illegally prosecuted!
Administered by the Minister
of National Health and Welfare, the provisions of the Marijuana
Legislation, originally passed under the federal governments residual power
to make laws for the peace, order and good government of Canada, are of no
force or effect until locally adopted and proclaimed into force via the
majority of voters in each Municipality across Canada just like Canada's
Prohibition of Alcohol. Reference: Laskin's Constitutional Law, (1951) and
R. v. Hauser
In 1991, Statistics Canada
reported 33,275 Canadians arrested and treated like criminals because of
their association with the Marijuana, Tree of Life culture and supposedly
violating this public health law which is not even legally in force.
We should be hiring
more health care professionals to treat health problems
and not judges, lawyers, police, and jail guards etc.
Answer: Your belt would NEVER be
A MATTER OF
OF CANADIAN DEATHS PER YEAR
according to Statistics Canada and the
Addiction Research Foundation nationwide in 1989.
Not Including second hand smoke!
Not including 45% of all motor vehicle deaths each year at 2,000
BY DRUGS, MEDICAMENTS ... 973
Aspirin, anti-cold, alcohol deterrents, sedatives, vaccines,
tranquilizers, anti-depressants, hypnotic, heart, anti-coagulants etc.
TREE OF LIFE /
MARIJUANA ... 0
Biblical: The Tree Heals
and extends life!
ATTENTION MEDICINAL MARIJUANA ADVOCATES & PATIENTS
of the ruling of the Court of Appeal for Ontario marijuana laws
remain in force until the appeal below is heard. Please read the judgment below
for information on Doctors etc. and your Marijuana Regulations.
Full Story: CBC Ontario “Ontario marijuana laws remain until
By virtue of the
Reasons for Judgment of Justice Taliano J.,
pronounced, April 11, 2011, in the Supreme Court of Ontario File No.:
[Citation: R. v. Mernagh, 2011 ONSC 2121], (See Disposition below) s. 4
(possession) and s. 7 (Production/Cultivation) under the Marihuana
Medical Access Regulations were
declared “constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect”. The
Declaration of invalidity was “suspended 3 months” and
now extended till after the Appeal process.
WHAT THIS MEANS TO YOU?
Had the Court of Appeal not extended the declaration in invalidity until
the appeal was heard then if by JULY
11, 2011, Parliament has not complied with this judgment, the Medicinal
Marijuana Laws would have become constitutionally
invalid and of no force or effect. It would therefore be lawful for
anyone to produce and possess marijuana for medicinal purposes without a
Doctors approval on an Application to Health Canada.
AND TAKE NOTICE THAT: If you
want a license from Health Canada, and cannot find a Doctor who will
prescribe Medicinal Marijuana, simply forward your application to Health
Canada upon based upon the references at the conclusion of the case:
 This figure would
include the patient witness MC whose evidence was presented in the Berin trial. Her request for medical approval of her
application to Health Canada was rejected by 7 physicians in British
Columbia. (Exhibit 21(i))  The reference to 19
communities would not be accurate because several of the 21 patient
witnesses testified that they tried to access marihuana through doctors in
several communities.  See the affidavit of
Jeannine Ritchot Exhibit 17 at p. 6.
EXCERPT FROM: COURT FILE NO.: 1640/09
Read full case here. http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2011/2011onsc2121/2011onsc2121.html
 For the foregoing reasons, this court declares
Marihuana Medical Access Regulations, SOR/2001-226
and the prohibitions against the possession and production of cannabis
(marihuana) contained in sections 4 and 7 respectively of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act, S.C.
1996, C. 19 are constitutionally invalid and of no force
declaration of invalidity is suspended for a period of three (3) months;
criminal charge against the applicant is permanently stayed;
applicant is granted a personal exemption to possess and/or produce
cannabis (marihuana) during the above noted period of suspension.
· Health Canada Medicinal